The Commerce Department preliminary anti-dumping duties on Chinese imports of refractory material
China news agency, Washington, June 14 (Reuters) 14 (reporter DE yong jian), the Commerce Department make a preliminary decision on Chinese imports of refractory material of 84.89% to 91.16% of anti-dumping duties.
Announcement released by the U.S. Commerce Department on the same day, punished for specific products containing at least 90% of silica silica brick, this kind of acid is mainly used for refractory masonry coke oven, ironmasters, glass kiln (1431, 5.00, 0.35%), high temperature melting pot.
According to U.S. trade remedy case handler, preliminary results were released, after all the companies involved should be paid to U.S. customs duties cash deposit, followed by the U.S. department of commerce and international trade committee is scheduled to make final this year in November and December respectively. If all is positive final, the United States customs will levy anti-dumping duties.
China's imports in silica brick began in November 2012. Utah a refractory material company to lodge a complaint, dumping in the United States claims that China's enterprises, asked the us department of commerce initiated an anti-dumping investigation, the margin of dumping was put forward as much as 118.47% to 290.12%.
The U.S. Commerce Department statistics show that in 2011 China's imports of silica brick gross about $43.24 million, but gross NianShu beauty sharply dropped to $2012 and $25.7 million, fell to forty percent.
In more than a month, the United States has a number of trade remedy actions against Chinese imports by, plywood, xanthan gum, steel wire, steel bar, such as frozen warmwater shrimp for products, daily necessities, chemical products, steel products, seafood, and many other categories.
Frequently waving the big stick of "trade for the United States", China's commerce ministry stressed several times, not only to the other countries' unfair trade protectionism, the domestic enterprises also is not good, hope the United States do not regard seemingly grandiose but with a strong political background of the measures to implement trade protectionism, and should abide by the commitment to oppose trade protectionism, properly handle trade frictions in a more rational method. (finish)
